06.01.08 -- Babel


The Tower of Babel as depicted in the engraving The Confusion of Tongues by Gustave Doré (1865)
-----------------

Sunday, June 1, 2008

Click here for LARGE PRINT.

EXTRA SYLL-UH-BLES, Puzzle by Patrick Berry, edited by Will Shortz

Paronomasia with silly syllables (say "uh") constitute the inter-related across entries of this wryly amusing Sunday crossword puzzle -- BUYABLEBELT (22. Waistband sold in stores?); MORALLYSAFER (27. Wiser from an ethical perspective?); THESALIVATIONARMY (32. Fighting force trained by Pavlov?); CORONERONTHEMARKET (56. Freelance autopsist?); HUMMABLEBEGINNINGS (63. Catchy song parts heard on “Name That Tune”?); RIOTINGIMPLEMENTS (81. Stones and brickbats?); RENTASENATOR (92A. Store that peddles political influence?); REDSKELETON (99. Boiled lobster’s feature?).

The best clue of this crossword is for ORANGE (49D. Self-descriptive fruit). Others: SAWS (13A. They may be big fellers); ADAM (41A. Leading man?); ASSES (72A. Pack carriers); ATTACKDOG (98A. Its bite is worse than its bark); SNOW (109. Fall around Christmas); WATER (15D. It’s in the spring); THUD (32D. Sound of a failure); MAST (44D. Ensign holder); PURSE (59D. Place to keep Mace); MISREAD (79D. Think that might is right?).

Puzzle personae: ADAM and SATAN (13D. Evildoer); MELMOTH the Wanderer” (1820 gothic novel) (9D.); JOHANN (10D. Composer Pachelbel); LADD (1A. Diane of “Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore”); DEY (40A. Actress Susan of “L.A. Law”); PAOLO (59A. Renaissance painter Uccello); CLAUDIA (61A. Lady Bird Johnson’s given birth name); SMEE (68A. Captain Hook’s mate in “Peter Pan”); MEESE (90A. Attorney general during Reagan’s second term); LANG (91A. “Metropolis” director); RONA (105A. Barrett of gossip); DOPEY (108A. Only beardless one of the Seven Dwarfs); ROSEY (21D. N.F.L. star Grier); CASS (30D. Buchanan’s secretary of state); INIGO (34D. Architect Jones); REESE (37D. Actress Witherspoon); ALGER (43D. “Tattered Tom” author); ASTIN (48D. John of “The Addams Family”); HANSARP (58D. Founding member of the Dadaists); GEORG (84D. Ohm of Ohm’s law); ELLERY (85D. Queen of mystery); HETTY Sorrel (woman in a love triangle in “Adam Bede”) (87D.); NORA Roberts, first inductee into the Romance Writers of America Hall of Fame (94D.).

Locations: RABAT (21A. World capital formerly a pirate stronghold); OCALA(49A. City just west of Silver Springs); ERITREA (66A. Country with a camel on its coat of arms); GRAEME Park, historical home near Philadelphia (52D.); PINSK (78D. Belarus port).

A few more links: 9D. Rimbaud’s UNE Saison en Enfer”, who hasn‘t had one of those?; AEROBE (46D. Bacterium that needs oxygen), I was squeezing in an “amoeba“; GAITER (104A. Ankle covering), not “garter“; ALLTEL (5D. Mobile phone company), this is the first time I heard of this company; CRASH (86D. 2005 Best Picture winner).

------------------

For today's cartoons, go to The Crossword Puzzle Illustrated.



Click on image to enlarge.

Puzzle available on the internet at


If you subscribe to home delivery of The New York Times you are eligible to access the daily crossword via The New York Times - Times Reader, without additional charge, as part of your home delivery subscription.


Across: 5. Picture holder; 10. ___ alai; 17. Prefix with business; 18. West African coins; 20. On one’s ___; 24. Issue to avoid; 26. Bad things to share; 29. Miller brand; 30. Two points?; 31. Wellborn folks; 38. Qualifying races; 39. Auto superseded by the Rambler; 45. Some cloisonné pieces; 46. Distresses; 47. Put through demeaning rituals; 50. Salon selections; 51. Kilo- times 1,000; 52. Mardi ___; 54. Skirts worn by both men and women; 62. Private; 67. Sign; 69. X3 and X5 maker; 73. T. ___ Price (investment firm); 75. Intervals; 76. Animation; 77. Minus; 78. Club wielders’ grp.; 79. Stud farm visitor; 80. Crème de la crème; 81. Stones and brickbats?; 86. Appointed; 95. Like glass doors, often; 102. Be part of the opening lineup; 103. High dudgeon; 104. Ankle covering; 106. Lots of talk; 107. Smidgen.
Down: 1. Testing facilities; 2. Flue symptom; 3. Washes without water; 4. Record keepers, of a sort; 5. Mobile phone company. 6. Bottom of the barrel; 7. Weave’s partner; 8. Rimbaud’s “___ Saison en Enfer”; 11. Gone from the company, maybe; 12. Like many large cos.; 14. To the rear of; 16. Alibi; 19. Premium vodka brand, for short; 23. Bug-ridden software releases; 25. Miniature; 28. Down Under jumper; 33. Lifesaver; 35. Ornamental piece of drapery; 36. Timber-dressing tool; 41. Squirrels’ cache; 42. Word to which a common reply is “Bitteschon”; 46. Bacterium that needs oxygen; 47. Submit; 51. Cheek teeth; 53. Vin color; 55. Organic compounds with nitrogen; 56. French aristocrats; 57. Nudge; 60. Not quite right; 63. Get better; 64. Slowly; 65. Motivate; 69. Fighting words; 70. Fly-catching aid; 71. Depression causes; 74. Granola tidbit; 75. Willing; 76. Appliances with lids; 80. It may come with attachments; 81. Not just sit there; 82. Projected onto a screen; 83. Last number in a column; 86. 2005 Best Picture winner; 88. Available by the pint, perhaps; 89. Rubberneck; 93. Alter pieces?; 95. ___-Ball; 96. Inadvisable action; 97. Chew on; 100. Per la grazia di ___ (by the grace of God); 101. Brand at a gas station.





05.31.08 -- Lobotomy


Frame from the 1959 film of “Suddenly, Last Summer”
-----------------

Saturday, May 31, 2008

Puzzle by Robert H. Wolfe, edited by Will Shortz

In Tennessee Williams's 1958 play, Suddenly, Last Summer, the protagonist is threatened with a lobotomy to stop her from telling the truth about her cousin Sebastian. The surgeon said, "I can't guarantee that a lobotomy would stop her—babbling!!!" To which her aunt responded, "That may be, maybe not, but after the operation who would believe her, Doctor?"

Four corner sets of three nine-to-ten-letter entries are the main feature of this pleasant, but characterless crossword:

Upper left, across: FATASAHOG (1. Porky); IDONTCARE (15A. “Whatever”); NUNNERIES (17A. Where habits are picked up?).

Upper right, down: SAILNEEDLE (12D. Tool for sewing canvas); NRADIATION (13. Certain atomic X-ray emission); SECONDHAND (14. Tick source).

Lower left, down: POSTMOSAIC (25. After the Pentateuchal period); INTHEAISLE (26. Between seating sections); THIRDFLOOR (27. Attic, often).

Lower right, across: PLAUSIBLE (56. Not too much of a stretch); BAWLEDOUT (59. Read the riot act); SOITSEEMS (61. “Sure looks that way”).

Two more ten-letter entries, GOINGAHEAD (29A. Proceeding); and MEDDLESOME (41A. Curious to a fault) head the remaining entries of this curiously conversational puzzle. Eight letter entries, EYETEETH (34A. Exchange for something very valuable) and THREETON (38A. Like some adult hippos). Seven-letter, KEISTER (19A. Seat); LAPTOPS (50A. Flight passengers often work on them); ACREAGE (6D. Spread statistic); DIESNON (22D. Day when courts are not in session); RENAULT (40D. One of three French auto-making brothers). Six-letter, ITLLDO (20A. “That’s good enough”); SADDEN (21A. Get down); ONHIRE (32A. Ready to get engaged?); ROLLON (40A. Product with a rotating ball); NANANA (45A. Lyric stand-in, perhaps); SILENT (47A. Clammy?); HAIRDO (7D. Top arrangement?); MALAWI (42D. Chichewa and English are its two official languages).

Five-letter -- ASONE, APSES, ASSNS, CERES, DEARE, HEALS, ILIAC, ILOST, NADIA, STETS, STILE, TILED. Four-letter -- ADIT, ADUE, ANNS, ENSE, ENYA, FINK, INGE, NETS, OBOE, PITT, PLUM, REEL, SELL, SEND, SETS, SOSA, TENT, TIDE, TONI. Three-letter -- GES, LAO, NIN, OAF, ORE, PBS, SSA.

I won’t babble on as I’ve nothing much to say about this one… perhaps it’s the lobotomy!

-----------------

For today’s cartoon, go to The Crossword Puzzle Illustrated.


Click on image to enlarge.

Puzzle available on the internet at

If you subscribe to home delivery of The New York Times you are eligible to access the daily crossword via The New York Times - Times Reader, without additional charge, as part of your home delivery subscription.

Across: 10. Socs.; 16. “The Wreck of the Mary ___” (1959 film); 18. Near the hip; 24. “The Novel of the Future” author; 25. First Earl of Chatham; 35. Vertical piece in a door frame; 36. Grp. Issuing Ids; 37. Tennis star Petrova; 43. Text messaging command; 44. Meatball; 55. Not independently; 58. Jenny Craig testimonial starter; 60. Heavenly discovery of 1801.
Down: 1. Obnoxious sort; 2. In unison; 3. 1956 Olympic skiing sensation ___ Sailer; 4. Saint ___ Bay, Jamaica; 5. Retaining instructions; 8. Bank deposit, of sorts; 9. Some appliances; 10. Passage to get 8-Down; 11. Bears do it; 20. “Splendor in the Grass” Oscar winner; 23. “Amarantine” Grammy winner; 36. Sportsman of the Year co-winner of 1998; 39. Cot spot; 46. Sites of some religious statues; 48. Massachusetts motto starter; 49. Court hangers; 51. “The washday miracle” sloganeer, once; 52. One found in the woods; 53. Extremely desirable; 54. Fixes; 56. Oscar show airer?; 57. Mekong Buddhist.



Internet Attacked as Tool of Terror



A controversial plan to study and profile domestic terrorism was scrapped after popular push back, however, the spirit of the legislation lives on in Senator Joe Lieberman's office.


HR 1955, "The Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007" passed the House in October 2007 with almost unanimous support. The bill immediately came under fire from civil liberties watchdogs because of what many saw as a deliberate targeting of Muslims and Arabs and the possible chilling effect it might have on free speech.


The original bill intended to set up a government commission to investigate the supposed threat of domestically produced terrorists and the ideologies that underpin their radicalization. The ten-member commission was to be empowered to "hold hearings and sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, receive such evidence, and administer such oaths as the Commission considers advisable to carry out its duties." The bill also singled out the Internet as a vehicle for terrorists to spread their ideology with the intention of recruiting and training new terrorists.


After significant public pressure, the bill stalled in the Senate. However, Senator Joe Lieberman (D-Connecticut), the current chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, has embraced the thrust of the legislation and has been working to push forward some of the goals of the original bill, including an attempt to weed out terrorist propaganda from the Internet.


Jim Dempsey, vice president for public policy at the non-profit Center for Democracy and Technology has spoken out against the assault on Internet speech. "I have more concern about what Senator Lieberman is doing than about HR 1955. [Lieberman] is no friend of civil liberties," Dempsey told Truthout, adding "there is concern that what he has planned will be worse than HR 1955."


Dempsey spoke out in favor of the spirit of HR 1955, calling the outpouring of criticism "hypothetical and hyperbolic." In his view, the study of radicalization and home grown ideologically based violence is worthwhile. However, he objects to recent actions taken by Lieberman.


On May 19, Lieberman sent a letter to Google Inc.'s CEO Eric Schmidt demanding that Google "immediately remove content produced by Islamist terrorist organizations from YouTube."


"By taking action to curtail the use of YouTube to disseminate the goals and methods of those who wish to kill innocent civilians, Google will make a singularly important contribution to this important national effort," Lieberman wrote.


Google fired back, refusing to take off material that did not violate its community guidelines. "While we respect and understand his views, YouTube encourages free speech and defends everyone's right to express unpopular points of view," Schmidt said in response, adding, "we believe that YouTube is a richer and more relevant platform for users precisely because it hosts a diverse range of views, and rather than stifle debate, we allow our users to view all acceptable content and make up their own minds."


Google removed some of the videos that violated their rules against posting violence and hate speech, but made a point to write, "most of the videos, which did not contain violent or hate speech content, were not removed because they do not violate our Community Guidelines."


"I think that Senator Lieberman's actions vis-a-vis Google were improper," Dempsey said. "A blame the messenger approach doesn't make sense as a response to radical violence. The notion that taking the videos off of YouTube will accomplish anything shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of the Internet. Take the videos off of YouTube and they'll appear elsewhere."


Senator Lieberman's staff failed to return calls for comment.


A New York Times editorial called Lieberman's claims about the Internet "ludicrous," and warned of an attempt to censor the Internet. Lieberman defended himself in a response letter, saying, "the peril here is not to legitimate dissent but to our fundamental right of self-defense."


According to civil liberties activists, Chairman Lieberman has been spearheading an effort to censor speech on the Internet. His committee recently released a report titled "Violent Islamist Extremism, The Internet, And The Home Grown Terrorism Threat," (PDF) a report detailing the use of web sites and Internet tools to spread pro-terrorism propaganda.


The report repeatedly blames Internet web sites and chat rooms for "radicalization," calling the web sites "portals" through which potential terrorists can "participate in the global violent Islamist movement and recruit others to their cause." As civil liberties groups have pointed out, the report focuses solely on terrorism seen as associated with Islam.


Also, the report relies heavily on experts from inside the US national security apparatus, with only one research study cited. The study by the New York Police Department details a hypothetical four step "radicalization process". The report was criticized by a coalition of civil liberties groups as "statistically and methodologically flawed," in a letter they wrote in response to the report.


Caroline Fredrickson, director of the ACLU Washington, DC, legislative office, said that Lieberman "is trying to decide what he thinks should go on the Internet," which, she said, "reeks of an interest in censoring all sorts of different dialogs."


"If someone criticizes Israel's treatment of Palestinians and favors Hamas, should that be censored?" Fredrickson asked.

http://www.truthout.org/article/internet-attacked-tool-terror

The New Order: When reading is a crime



Is this what it is going to be like? When simple possession of a proscribed document will be enough to see you clapped in irons and whisked down to the local police station?


About two weeks ago (May 16), Nottingham University campus was agog as police arrived to interview former student Hicham Yezza. After some ten years' study, first as undergraduate, then graduate, Hicham was a non-academic member of staff in one of the University departments.


His mistake was to agree to help Rizwaan Sabir, a friend in the Politics faculty, who needed a document downloaded from the web and printed off. This was all part of legitimate study: the document itself was on the Politics Faculty reading list. Unfortunately, the document in question also happened to be an al-Qaeda Training Manual.


Someone noticed. They informed their superiors, who in turn referred the matter on upward. Eventually, the issue reached the very top. The Vice-Chancellor, Registrar and senior management of the University decided it was beyond them. They owed a duty of care to all their students. The implications behind the download were too large. So they handed the matter over to the local Police.


Which is where we came in. Rizwaan Sabir and Hicham Yezza were arrested. Their homes were searched, laptops confiscated, friends interviewed. They were subjected to six days of questioning - and then released. Or at least, Sabir was released. Hicham’s story now takes a turn for the decidedly worse. He is – he was – in the process of applying for indefinite leave to remain in the UK. The focus of the inquiry shifted to the possibility that he had been less than truthful in his application to stay.


So he was re-arrested under the Immigration Act and moved directly to a detention centre. From there, he is due to be deported back to Algeria this Sunday.


According to the Nottingham University Students’ Union, the deportation was originally scheduled for mid-July, but it has been brought forward as an “emergency”. As the Police appear not to have wished to charge Hicham with anything in connection with the original investigation, it is not clear what the emergency could be.


Unless he hears back from the Home Office, or is successful in being granted a judicial review of the decision today, Hicham will be sent back without having had the chance to argue his side of the matter in open court.


The story itself is staggering: from long-term settled resident, to deportee, within two weeks. But there are some features that may be worth pondering.


The die was cast when the University authorities decided not to investigate, but instead to pass the matter on to the Police. Was that the right decision? The only real grounds they had for suspecting anything to be amiss was the downloading of a book.


Of course, this very fact is now grounds for arrest. Under s.58 of the Terrorism Act 2000, a person commits an offence if they “possesses a document or record containing information”… “of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism”.


The apparent breadth of this formula was seriously narrowed in February of this year, when the Court of Appeal ruled that simple possession could not be enough for a conviction. There had to be demonstrable intent to commit terrorist acts as well. Nonetheless, the University authorities will argue – they have argued – that they had no right to take any other decision. Many have disagreed.


The role of the police is equally interesting. Supt Simon Nickless from Nottinghamshire Police claimed this operation was low-key, and the community's response to it had been "calm and rational".


In truly Orwellian style, he added: "Feedback is that people accept that this is the sort of operation that is necessary and reasonable for the welfare of communities."


Nonetheless, there remain concerns, raised by supporters of Hicham, that the police focus was prompted very much by the ethnicity of the suspect.


Perhaps the last word should go to Alan Simpson, MP for Nottingham South. He described the original arrest as a “dreadful cock-up”. The subsequent deportation was a blatant attempt “to try to justify the abuse of that power under the Terrorism Act. If we allow this to be done in our name, in our silent collusion, we become the architects of our own totalitarianism. We live in fear of speaking openly. We live in fear of enquiring and researching openly... We live in fear of the quiet unannounced knock on the door and we live in fear of our own shallowness, in terms of the willingness to stand side-by-side with each other in order to defend the very basis of an open democracy that we claim that terrorism is a threat to."


Update:
The Home Office has cancelled removal directions to have Hicham Yezza deported on Sunday following an application in the High Court.


His solicitors will return to the High Court this afternoon to seek to have him released while his case is reconsidered.


David Smith, solicitor at Cartwright King, said: "We hope and trust that the Home Office will now release Mr Yezza and reconsider his case properly and in accordance with the law."

John Ozimek
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/30/student_arrested_downloading_book/

Leo Strauss and the Neocon Lust for Terror



Leo Strauss is the father of the NeoConservative movement, including many leaders of the current administration. Indeed, some of the main neocon players were students of Strauss at the University of Chicago, where he taught for many years. Strauss, born in Germany, was an admirer of Nazi philosophers and of Machiavelli.

Strauss believed that a stable political order required an external threat and that if an external threat did not exist, one should be manufactured. Specifically, Strauss thought that:

"A political order can be stable only if it is united by an external threat . . . . Following Machiavelli, he maintained that if no external threat exists then one has to be manufactured".
(quote is by one of Strauss' main biographers).

Indeed, Stauss used the analogy of Gulliver's Travels to show what a Neocon-run society would look like:
"When Lilliput [the town] was on fire, Gulliver urinated over the city, including the palace. In so doing, he saved all of Lilliput from catastrophe, but the Lilliputians were outraged and appalled by such a show of disrespect."
Moreover, Strauss said:
"Only a great fool would call the new political science diabolic . . . Nevertheless one may say of it that it fiddles while Rome burns. It is excused by two facts: it does not know that it fiddles, and it does not know that Rome burns."

So Strauss seems to have advocated governments letting terrorizing catastrophes happen on one's own soil to one's own people -- of "pissing" on one's own people, to use his Gulliver's travel analogy. And he advocates that government's should pretend that they did not know about such acts of mayhem: to intentionally "not know" that Rome is burning. He advocates messing with one's own people in order to save them from some "catastrophe" (perhaps to justify military efforts to monopolize middle eastern oil to keep it away from an increasingly-powerful China?).

Fast Forward a Couple of Decades

Fast forward to the 1990's . . .

Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor seemed to hint at this approach when he wrote in 1997:

"as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat." (p. 211)
Similarly, the Project For A New American Century, a think tank lobbying group with Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Feith and the other leading Neocons in its ranks, lamented that its rapacious military agenda would not be realized "absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event -- like a new Pearl Harbor."

Don't believe that these quotes represent anything nefarious yet?

Fast forward to today . . .

Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said the American people lack "the maturity to recognize the seriousness of the threats." What's to be done? According to Rumsfeld, "The correction for that, I suppose, is [another] attack."

Newt Gingrich recently said:
"the better they've done at making sure there isn't an attack, the easier it is to say, 'Well, there never was going to be an attack anyway.' And it's almost like they should every once in a while have allowed an attack to get through just to remind us."
The head of the Arkansas Republican party said:
"At the end of the day, I believe fully the president is doing the right thing, and I think all we need is some attacks on American soil like we had on [Sept. 11, 2001]" so people appreciate Bush.
Philadelphia Daily News columnist Stu Bykofsky openly called for "another 9/11" that "would help America" restore a "community of outrage and national resolve".

Lt.-Col. Doug Delaney, chair of the war studies program at the Royal Military College in Kingston, Ontario, told the Toronto Star that "The key to bolstering Western resolve is another terrorist attack like 9/11 or the London transit bombings of two years ago."

And an allegedly-leaked GOP memo touts a new terror attack as a way to reverse the party's decline.

It's All Hot Air, Isn't It?

But isn't this all talk? They wouldn't really allow terror to happen . . . or aid and abet such attacks. Would they?

Well, President Carter recently impliedly acknowledged the risk of staged provocation in order to start a war against Iran.

A former National Security Adviser told the Senate that a terrorist act might be carried out in the U.S. and falsely blamed on Iran to justify war against that nation.

Former Senator Gary Hart warned Americans that the White House might create a "Gulf of Tonkin" or "remember the Maine" type incident to justify war against Iran (starting at 7:15 minutes)

Current U.S. Congressman Ron Paul stated, the government "is determined to have martial law", and that the government is hoping to get the people "fearful enough that they will accept the man on the white horse"

Daniel Ellsberg, the famous Pentagon Papers whistleblower, said "if there is another terror attack, "I believe the president will get what he wants", which will include a dictatorship.

A retired 27-year CIA analyst who prepared and presented Presidential Daily Briefs and served as a high-level analyst for several presidents, stated that if there was another major attack in the U.S., it would lead to martial law. He went on to say:
"We have to be careful, if somebody does this kind of provocation, big violent explosions of some kind, we have to not take the word of the masters there in Washington that this was some terrorist event because it could well be a provocation allowing them, or seemingly to allow them to get what they want."
The former CIA analyst would not put it past the government to "play fast and loose" with terror alerts and warnings and even events themselves in order to rally people behind the flag

The former assistant secretary of treasury in the Reagan administration, called the "Father of Reaganomics", who is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and Scripps Howard News Service, and, said:

"Ask yourself: Would a government that has lied us into two wars and is working to lie us into an attack on Iran shrink from staging "terrorist" attacks in order to remove opposition to its agenda?"
He goes on to say:

If the Bush administration wants to continue its wars in the Middle East and to entrench the "unitary executive" at home, it will have to conduct some false flag operations that will both frighten and anger the American people and make them accept Bush's declaration of "national emergency" and the return of the draft. Alternatively, the administration could simply allow any real terrorist plot to proceed without hindrance.

A series of staged or permitted attacks would be spun by the captive media as a vindication of the neoconsevatives' Islamophobic policy, the intention of which is to destroy all Middle Eastern governments that are not American puppet states. Success would give the US control over oil, but the main purpose is to eliminate any resistance to Israel's complete absorption of Palestine into Greater Israel.

Think about it. If another 9/11-type "security failure" were not in the works, why would Homeland Security czar Chertoff go to the trouble of convincing the Chicago Tribune that Americans have become complacent about terrorist threats and that he has "a gut feeling" that America will soon be hit hard?

A member of the British Parliament stated that "there is a very real danger" that the American government will stage a false flag terror attack in order to justify war against Iran and to gain complete control domestically

And the former UN Weapons Inspector, an American, who stated before the Iraq war started that there were no weapons of mass destruction is now saying that he would not rule out staged government terror by the U.S. government.

Does that sound like the Neocons' expressions of yearning for terror are just so much talk? Or does it sound like the disciples of Leo Strauss are willing to "manufacture threats" and "fiddle while Rome burns"?

And if the it is the latter, and the same people made the expressions of yearning before 9/11, the anthrax attacks and the London bombings, what does that imply about the cause of those events? George Washington's Blog

Vatican Celebrates Darwin





The Defrauded Gorilla: That Man wants to claim my Pedigree. He says he is one of my Descendants. Mr. Bergh: Now, Mr. DARWIN, how could you insult him so?


The Vatican is planning a special conference in 2009 to mark the 150th anniversary of the publication of On the Origin of the Species, Charles Darwin’s groundbreaking theory of evolution.



First printed in November 1859, Darwin’s evolutionary theories rocked the faith of Victorian Christians and are stoutly contested today by Creationists. The Vatican has traditionally backed a more nuanced approach.


Three years ago, Cardinal Paul Poupard, the then president of the Pontifical Council for Culture, said Darwin’s theory of Evolution and the Old Testament book of Genesis were “perfectly compatible” if the Bible were correctly read, saying: "The fundamentalists want to give a scientific meaning to words that had no scientific aim," explaining that the real message in Genesis was that “the universe didn't make itself and had a creator."



Next year's conference will be held in Rome and organised by Poupard's former office, the Pontifical Council for Culture as well as by the University of Notre Dame and six pontifical universities. The event, claim its organisers, is a milestone in the rapprochement between science and the Church.


They say it is time for the Church to look at Evolution again, “from a broader perspective”, explaining “appropriate consideration is needed more than ever before.”


Professor Gennaro Auletta, who is head of the Science and Philosophy faculty at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome and the main conference organiser told Edward Pentin of Newsweek (Newsweek Blog):


“We hope this will really be an example of how to hold an open discussion without overtones. We simply wish to dialogue between people whose mission is to understand a little more.” Times

Decoding secret world of Opus Dei

Vatican
Opus Dei, the Work of God: A Church within a Church?

The successful novel The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown has raised public interest in the controversial Catholic lay group Opus Dei, depicting it as a sect focused on wealth and power.

As part of the BBC's Who Runs Your World? series, the BBC's Max Seitz travelled to Spain - the country where Opus Dei was founded and seems to be most influential.


Opus Dei - which in Latin means "Work of God" - has been accused of manipulating its followers, but denies all such claims.


People on the streets of the Spanish capital, Madrid, told me that they believe Opus Dei is a secret society which has infiltrated politics and businesses.


"Opus Dei has a lot of power in Spain, and it's also influential in other countries," one person told me.


"There are lots of things we still don't know about them - they just let us know what they want," said another.


"Opus Dei is a powerful organisation which uses its schools and universities to grow more influential."


Opus Dei saint


But what's the truth behind this perception? Is Opus Dei as powerful as people think?


This Catholic group claims around 85,000 members around the world, one third of them in Spain. Members are encouraged to promote the evangelising mission through their professional work.


In other words, they aim to be very successful in their jobs while at the same time being charitable to other people and trying to attract more followers.


Franco's regime was a period of political and economic success for Opus Dei, but at the same time has given the group a bad name
Alberto Moncada
Spanish sociologist

In 2002, thousands of pilgrims from around the world travelled to the Vatican when Pope John Paul II canonised the founder of Opus Dei, Josemaria Escriva de Balaguer, in a "fast track" process only 27 years after his death.


He also granted Opus Dei the status of "personal prelature" - which has given the group some independence within the Catholic Church. That is why some say that Opus Dei grew more influential in the Vatican during the papacy of John Paul II.


But Opus Dei's spokesman Jack Valero denies it: "The number of people from Opus Dei working in the Vatican is very reduced: five or maybe six people, including the spokesman Joaquin Navarro-Valls. The influence of Opus Dei in the Holy See has been exaggerated."


But critics say there are more clergymen with links to Opus Dei, and that they have created a "Church within the Church", something that the Catholic group denies.


Statue of Josemaria Escriva de Balaguer
Opus Dei founder Josemaria Escriva de Balaguer has been canonised

Opus Dei has also had prominent representatives among governments and companies, although they usually do not publicly recognise their membership.


The Spanish sociologist Alberto Moncada - himself a former Opus Dei member - explains that the link between Opus Dei and power could be traced back to the 50's, when two representatives of the group were appointed ministers during General Franco's regime.


"Franco's regime was a period of political and economic success for Opus Dei, but at the same time has given the group a bad name," he said.


"People still remember this old time. However, things have changed. Although some members of Opus Dei are active in politics and businesses nowadays, they don't act together like a mafia. That's not true."


The UK education secretary, Ruth Kelly, has recently confirmed reports that she is a member of Opus Dei.


Control


In Latin America, Colombian President Alvaro Uribe is also said to be a member - something he has not confirmed.


Opus Dei's spokesman Jack Valero says religion is something that should be kept private.


"Opus Dei membership is a private matter," he said. "We don't publicise our members list. Some high-profile politicians say publicly that they belong to Opus Dei, yes, but that's not relevant to their job as government officials or congressmen. What's really important is how they do their job."


Carmen Charo
Each member has lots of spiritual tasks to fulfil... and his or her development as a free person isn't really considered - one is always under the orders of the spiritual leaders
Carmen Charo,
former numerary
It is difficult to pin down just how much money Opus Dei has. The group is decentralised into scores of foundations around the world, and it does not publicise its general accounts. Members have to donate a significant part of their income.


But maybe the most overlooked aspect of Opus Dei's power is that it is said to wield over its followers. Accusations have been made of brainwashing and manipulation in centres where celibate members live, the so-called "numeraries".


"Life is schizophrenic in Opus Dei centres," says former numerary Carmen Charo.


"Each member has lots of spiritual tasks to fulfil, like praying, going to mass every day, training other followers, and his or her development as a free person isn't really considered - one is always under the orders of the spiritual leaders, and also under their strict control. The same happens with your money."


Members of Opus Dei respond to these criticisms by saying that they are normal people working in the midst of the world just like anyone else, and that they are free and can leave whenever they want.


"It's a vocation," says Jose Maria Villalon. "You can freely choose your way of life and I have chosen to find God in my work as a member of Opus Dei.


"Someone within the group could have made some mistake, even myself. That's normal in any organisation run by human beings. However I completely deny that people are manipulated or brainwashed."


So are Opus Dei members saints or sinners? Many in Spain say the answer lies somewhere in between.

BBC

More at Newsweek:
Decoding Opus Dei

Hidden Historical Fact:


The Allied Attempt to Starve Germany in 1919

Article from The Barnes Review, April 1996, pp. 11-14.


Kollwitz, ''Germany's Children are Starving''
This drawing, done in 1924 by Käthe Kollwitz, is titled "Germany's Children Are Starving". It speaks for itself.
Even after an armistice ended World War I, the rapacious victors continued a devastating blockade of Germany.

If one word could describe Germany during the immediate aftermath of World War I, it would be "starvation." And yet, while some 900,000 German men, women and children were starving to death, the American and British public knew nothing about the reason for this holocaust, deliberately caused by the continuation of a wartime British naval blockade.


Britain's post-war naval blockade of food to Germany in 1919 matched the then current blockade of news by the American and British press. Even today, only a few non-Germans know the truth, and American and British historians, for the most part, have participated in the coverup of this most appalling crime.


The guilt of the world press in covering up the atrocity is compounded by the fact that the American and British public were told of the starvation itself, but were kept ignorant of the criminal policies of the Allies which produced it.


Newspapers carried stories of relief efforts to rescue the starving. The most famed of these efforts was directed by Herbert Hoover, later to become the 31st president.


As told by Otto Friedrich in Before the Deluge: A Portrait of Berlin in the 1920s, John Maynard Keynes cited the testimony of an observer who accompanied Herbert Hoover's mission to help the starving:


    You think [this] is a kindergarten for the little ones. No, these are children of seven and eight years. Tiny faces, with large, dull eyes, overshadowed by huge puffed, rickety foreheads, their small arms just skin and bones, and above the crooked legs with their dislocated joints the swollen, pointed stomachs of the hunger edema... "You see this child here," the physician in charge explained, "it consumed an incredible amount of bread, and yet it did not get any stronger. I found out that it hid all the bread it received underneath its straw mattress. The fear of hunger was so deeply rooted in the child that it collected the stores instead of eating the food: a misguided animal instinct made the dread of hunger worse than the actual pangs."

Meanwhile, the armistice terms dictated by the Allies at Versailles would assure that Germany could not recover economically even to the point of providing a subsistence livelihood for the majority of its citizens.


France was to get Alsace-Lorraine outright; she would occupy all German territory west of the Rhine for 15 years and she would take possession of the rich coal mines of the Saar district, which was to be governed by the League of Nations. Poland would get the important industrial region of Upper Silesia, most of Posen Province and West Prussia, thus establishing a "Polish Corridor" to the sea and cutting off East Prussia from the rest of Germany.


Denmark and Belgium would slice off several border regions and the League of Nations would take charge of Germany's African colonies.


Searching through garbage for food
Elderly German women search through piles of garbage for something to eat in Berlin in 1919.

If Germany did not sign, the Allies were ready to invade and occupy the country. After a number of resignations, the German government at Weimar agreed to the "unheard-of injustice" of the Treaty of Versailles.


Immediately following the war, Germany was wracked with insurgencies, coups and counter-coups. The Bolsheviks attempted a takeover similar to the revolution in Russia. The Allies, meeting in Versailles, celebrated the unrest and destruction. And the people - particularly the American people - were kept in the dark about the continuing blockade.


Communist agents, sent by the Bolshevik regime in the fledgling USSR, were fomenting revolutions throughout the prostrate country. As Gen. Leon Degrelle points out in his Hitler: Born at Versailles:


    While the murder of defenseless civilians was carried out in Bavaria, the delegates at the Paris Peace Conference had their first meeting. Far from being horrified at such massacres, the Allies could not contain their glee. The Bavarian bloodbath was a gift from the gods, which meant that Germany would be split and more Germans would be killed. Allied diplomatic envoys were rushed to Munich to kowtow to the bloodthirsty trio [three agents sent by V. I. Lenin named Levine, Levien and Axelrod]. They offered food and money to bolster their opposition to Berlin.

And then, Degrelle says what few historians will admit: "Although the war had ended, Germany was still under Allied blockade [editor's emphasis], which was ruthlessly enforced. The first state of Germany to benefit from a lifting of the blockade would be communist-controlled Bavaria."


One must search diligently for historical references to the continued, devastating blockade. And when mention is found, it is usually just that - a mere mention. Diether Raff confirms the peace-time blockade in his A History of Germany - From the Medieval Empire to the Present:


    "The Allied peace terms turned out to be extremely severe, far exceeding the worst fears of the German government... The peace treaties of Brest-Litovsk and Bucharest were declared invalid and the food blockade around Germany was to continue... Thus Germany's capitulation was accomplished and an end set to four years of enormous bloodshed."

The effectiveness of the blockade, initiated years before the entry of the United States into the war, and which led to the sinking of the Lusitania, has been well documented.


"It was the blockade that finally drove the Central Powers to accept defeat," says Richard Hoveth in his study of the struggle on the high seas during World War 1. "At first mild in its application, the blockade's noose gradually tightened until, with the American entry, all restraint was cast aside. Increasingly deprived of the means to wage war, or even to feed her population, the violent response was insurrection; apathy and demoralization the mute consequence of dashed hopes and thin potato soup."


Basil Liddell Hart is quoted by Hoveth to the effect that, revolution and internal unrest notwithstanding, the blockade was "clearly the decisive agency in the struggle."


Berliners exchange potato peelings for firewood
Berliners exchange potato peelings for firewood. As the grip of the Allied blockade tightened, waste materials became valuable commodities to be processed and reused.
The Marshall Cavendish Encyclopedia has two poignant photos taken in Germany during the final year of the war. In one, Berliners exchange potato peelings for firewood. "As the grip of the Allied blockade tightened, waste materials became valuable commodities to be processed and reused." Another photo shows a large crowd of people at an outdoor soup kitchen with the caption: "Berliners crowd 'round a mobile municipal kitchen for a cheap meal - hot dinners, 35 pfennigs a portion.'"

The Allies clearly intended to starve the German people to death, foreshadowing the Morgenthau Plan of the latter days of World War II - a plan that actually went into operation to starve and exterminate one third of the German population.


After confiscating the German merchant navy, the Allies proceeded to confiscate German private property all over the world, contrary to all precedent from previous wars when private property had been held in escrow until the ratification of peace treaties, when it would revert to its legitimate owners.


Degrelle writes: "The Allied powers reserve the right to keep or dispose of assets belonging to German citizens, including companies they control [Article 167 B]. This wholesale expropriation would take place without any compensation to the owners [Articles 121 and 279 B]."


And, Germany remained responsible for the liabilities and loans on the assets that were taken from them. Profits, however, remained in the hands of the Allies. Thus, private German property and assets were confiscated in China (Articles 129 and 132), Thailand (Articles 135-137), Egypt (Article 148), Liberia (Articles 135-140) and in many other countries.


Germany was also precluded from investing capital in any neighboring country and had to forfeit all rights "to whatever title it may possess in these countries."


The Allies were given free access to the German marketplace without the slightest tariff while products made in Germany faced high foreign tariff barriers. Articles 264 to 267 established that Germany "undertakes to give the Allies and their associates the status of most favored nations for five years."Germany, of course, had no such equal status.


Germany was experiencing near famine conditions. It was at this moment the Allies decided to confiscate a substantial part of what was left of Germany's livestock. The American representative at Versailles, Thomas Lamont, recorded the event with some indignation:


    "The Germans were made to deliver cattle, horses, sheep, goats, etc.,... A strong protest came from Germany when dairy cows were taken to France and Belgium, thus depriving German children of milk."

Food shortages were such that 60,000 Ruhr miners refused to work overtime unless they were paid, even in the form of butter. When it became obvious that Germany would not be able to deliver the coal ordered by the treaty, the Allies lowered the amount from 43 million tons to 20 million tons.


Degrelle points out that the virtual confiscation of German coal production led to the deaths of German children for lack of fuel for heat.


John Williams, in the epilogue of his story about the war on the home front, has this one sentence: "In Germany... still subject to the blockade, blank misery prevailed."


In his biography of Woodrow Wilson, Arthur Walworth says that the British command in Germany reported that food shortages raised a specter of anarchy.


    "Herbert Hoover, who had gone abroad after the armistice eager to use American surpluses to feed the hungry of Europe, soon had found that the idealistic professions of individuals at London and Paris did not square with their actions as officials of electorates that were swayed by war hatred and economic necessity. Shipments had been delivered to Allies and to neutrals, but British officials had refused to break their blockade to let cargoes go into Germany. Moreover, Germany had failed to act on an agreement to turn over merchant ships before receiving food [eventually forced on the Weimar government. -Ed.] and showed no desire to pay for shipments in gold - a possibility that French financiers were thought to be opposing so that their nation might get what gold there was as indemnity."

There is evidence that Wilson actually thought the European powers would accept his "14 Points" and feed starving Germans now that the war was over. But, of course, that was not the case as discovered by Wilson's humanitarian point man, Hoover. England's Lloyd George, meanwhile, thought that the starvation was being ameliorated. He favored - although quietly - feeding his ex-enemy.


    "Frustrated by apathy and obstruction, Hoover was brought on the carpet by [British Prime Minister] Lloyd George, who was inclined to brush him off as 'that Salvation Army man.' The prime minister, distressed by reports of famine in Germany, wanted to know why Hoover had not done his job. At this the American let him have the bitter truth. Lloyd George, feeling that tact was not one of Hoover's great qualities, asked him to give the council an expurgated version of his remarks. This was done, and a stormy and wordy session ensued."

The food blockade was not terminated until July 12, 1919. On May 7 of that year, Count von Brockdorf-Rantzau had indignantly referred to this fact in addressing the Versailles assembly. "The hundreds of thousands of noncombatants," the German chief delegate had stated, "who have perished since November 11, 1918, as a result of the blockade, were killed with cold deliberation, after our enemies had been assured of their complete victory."


The murderous Allied blockade, which continued for eight months after the end of the war, was one reason why a German war veteran who decided to go into politics a decade later was able to revive the seared memory of a German nation which had suffered greatly and vault himself to absolute power. His name, of course, was Adolf Hitler.


Original Link Here

05.30.08 -- Rigmarole



Illustration from an 18th century Icelandic manuscript of
Loki, a villainous Norse deity with the ability to transmogrify.

-----------------

Friday, May 30, 2008

Click here for abridged post in LARGE PRINT.



Puzzle by Nathan Last, edited by Will Shortz

RIGMAROLE (1A. Elaborate procedure) leads off this crossword as the first entry and amusingly finishes with IAMSODEAD (60A. “My parents are gonna kill me!”) -- in between we are treated to such fun fare as BEESKNEES (16A. Living end); CANITRYSOME (21D. Question while eying someone else’s plate); TAKETHERAP (25D. Be a whipping boy); FLYSOLO (39D. Eschew aid) which no one in this heavily populated puzzle will do, for there is plenty of company.

LOKI (34A. Shape-shifting giant of myth) headlines this puzzle's large cast of characters which include a JERK (10A. Creep); ASTA (38A. Four-legged film star of the ‘30s); an ORYX (46A. Animal some believe to be the source of the unicorn myth) AMONG (17A. In with) homo sapiens READE (19A. “The Wandering Heir” novelist, 1872); COEN (21A. “The Big Lebowski” director); STYNE (35A. “Just in Time” composer); ERROL (54A. “The Fog of War” director Morris); CHICOMARX (55A. Old comedian known for his unique piano-playing style); ILER (2D. He played on of TV’s Sopranos); ACKROYD (5D. Peter who wrote “The Last Testament of Oscar Wilde”); EDSEL (9D. Old bomb); JIMIHENDRIX (10D. Follower of Sha Na Na at Woodstock); SHEA (50D. Jets used to be seen there); SADE (35D. She had a 1993 hit with “No Ordinary Love”); RICCI (45D. Golden Globe-nominated actress for “The Opposite of Sex,” 1998); RANEES (6D. Eastern Royals); OCEANAUTS (7D. Sealab inhabitants); and a PIXIE (15A. Playful trickster).

Dry stuff includes OLEICACID (14A. Soapmaking compound); OBELISK (42A. Luxor Temple sight); ERECTS (43D. Assembles); EXONERATES (11D. Clears); ANABOLISM (32D. Process of molecular synthesis); TETRAD (47A. The classical elements, e.g.); NTEST (47A. Big bang creator); and the very wet LETHE (22A. River in Hades).



Dante submerged in the River Lethe, by Gustave Dore: illustration from The Purgatorio.

-----------------

Action, emotion and condition includes LIED (8D Invented things); STAYSAT (24A. Occupies); LEERAT (27A. Not view innocently); STAND (30A. Something to take in court); NAPE (33A. Rabbit punch landing site); FREED (39A. Let out); HYPER (44A. Bouncing off the walls); SEAMY (57A. Squalid); TYPE (59A. Disclosure on eHarmony); MIS (4D. Fire starter?); RINK (12D. Flames shoot in it); PASTE (15D. Belt); STONE (24D. Pit); Sneak APEEK (28D.); SINKS (20A. Settles); AXED (53D. Dumped); APTLY (41D. Well); and MAD (56D. Unbalanced).

TEND (29D. Lean) and DTEN (36A. Call in the game Battleship) pair up anagrammatically mid-puzzle -- the remaining clues are the acrosses 18. Where to find lifesavers, for short; 31. Orsk is on it; 37. “Without ANET” (Grateful Dead album); 49. Keys; 51. Org. that can’t be lax about LAX?. The downs include 1. Something to put on before trying?; 3. Goes right; 13. They’re tapped; 23. Publication with an annual “Green Issue”); 26. “TRYTO Forget” (Harbach/Kern tune); 30. Plane wing part; 47. Leaves home?; 48. One before four; 51. Top pick, slangily; 52. Scena segment.

Did I forget CESTLAVIE (58A. “Oh well”)!

------------------

For today's cartoons, go to The Crossword Puzzle Illustrated.











Click on image to enlarge.








Puzzle available on the internet at







THE NEW YORK TIMES -- Crossword Puzzles and Games









If you subscribe to home delivery of The New York Times you are eligible to access the daily crossword via The New York Times - Times Reader, without additional charge, as part of your home delivery subscription.